<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89376</link>
    <description>Watchmen employed in a workshop are not treated as workmen for computing the worker threshold under Notification No. 54/75-C.E. because they do not participate in the manufacturing process and their duties are too remote to be regarded as incidental to or connected with it. Their names therefore cannot be included when determining whether the unit crosses the permissible limit for exemption eligibility. The exclusion of watchmen was directed to be applied for fresh consideration of eligibility under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:25:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89376</link>
      <description>Watchmen employed in a workshop are not treated as workmen for computing the worker threshold under Notification No. 54/75-C.E. because they do not participate in the manufacturing process and their duties are too remote to be regarded as incidental to or connected with it. Their names therefore cannot be included when determining whether the unit crosses the permissible limit for exemption eligibility. The exclusion of watchmen was directed to be applied for fresh consideration of eligibility under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>