<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for duty at the single ply yarn stage. It held that duty paid at the multi-fold/double-fold stage was sufficient and that charging duty twice on the same commodity was impermissible. The Tribunal emphasized that double or multi-folding does not create a new product, aligning with previous court decisions. The judgment highlighted that duty cannot be demanded again at the single ply yarn stage after payment at the multi-fold/double-fold stage to avoid double charging on the same commodity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:14:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand for duty at the single ply yarn stage. It held that duty paid at the multi-fold/double-fold stage was sufficient and that charging duty twice on the same commodity was impermissible. The Tribunal emphasized that double or multi-folding does not create a new product, aligning with previous court decisions. The judgment highlighted that duty cannot be demanded again at the single ply yarn stage after payment at the multi-fold/double-fold stage to avoid double charging on the same commodity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>