https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89363 A challenge to a central excise demand remained maintainable even though no appeal had been filed against the approved classification list. The controlling principle was that once the Supreme Court had held quick lime and hydrated lime to be not chargeable to duty, no excise demand could survive on those products. The demand was therefore unsustainable and the confirmation of central excise duty was set aside. en-us Sun, 30 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:40:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89363 A challenge to a central excise demand remained maintainable even though no appeal had been filed against the approved classification list. The controlling principle was that once the Supreme Court had held quick lime and hydrated lime to be not chargeable to duty, no excise demand could survive on those products. The demand was therefore unsustainable and the confirmation of central excise duty was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Sun, 30 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89363