<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89354</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the Collector&#039;s decision ordering duty payment, property confiscation, and penalty. The Appellate Tribunal confirmed the duty demand based on evidence provided by the Printing Master and Director, rejecting arguments for cross-examination. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on penalty and fine issues, citing a Delhi High Court judgment that limited the Department&#039;s power to levy such sanctions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 217 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89354</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the Collector&#039;s decision ordering duty payment, property confiscation, and penalty. The Appellate Tribunal confirmed the duty demand based on evidence provided by the Printing Master and Director, rejecting arguments for cross-examination. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on penalty and fine issues, citing a Delhi High Court judgment that limited the Department&#039;s power to levy such sanctions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>