<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89341</link>
    <description>A later show cause notice that proposed a different tariff classification was treated as a fresh notice because it materially changed the basis of the demand rather than merely clarifying the earlier case. The earlier notice had proposed reclassification under Tariff Heading 85.15, but the department issued the later notice after about a decade with new classifications. On that footing, the later notice could not be treated as a continuation of the earlier notice, and the resulting duty demand was held time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:36:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89341</link>
      <description>A later show cause notice that proposed a different tariff classification was treated as a fresh notice because it materially changed the basis of the demand rather than merely clarifying the earlier case. The earlier notice had proposed reclassification under Tariff Heading 85.15, but the department issued the later notice after about a decade with new classifications. On that footing, the later notice could not be treated as a continuation of the earlier notice, and the resulting duty demand was held time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>