https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89337 Where reversal or denial of Modvat credit on inputs used in making rigid polyurethane foam was already covered by a separate show-cause notice, that issue had to be adjudicated in those proceedings and not in the present appeal. The Tribunal treated the later notice as the proper forum for deciding the admissibility of credit and any consequential reversal, and therefore declined to pass any order on that question in the appeal before it. The principle stated is that a specific credit dispute already pending under a separate notice should not be decided in parallel proceedings. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:29:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89337 Where reversal or denial of Modvat credit on inputs used in making rigid polyurethane foam was already covered by a separate show-cause notice, that issue had to be adjudicated in those proceedings and not in the present appeal. The Tribunal treated the later notice as the proper forum for deciding the admissibility of credit and any consequential reversal, and therefore declined to pass any order on that question in the appeal before it. The principle stated is that a specific credit dispute already pending under a separate notice should not be decided in parallel proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89337