<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 237 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89328</link>
    <description>The exemption notification condition requiring payment by cheque drawn on a co-operative society&#039;s bank account was held to be directory, not mandatory, where the purchases were in fact made by registered co-operative societies and payments by demand draft or pay order came from their own bank accounts or funds. The condition was aimed at ensuring genuine society purchases and preventing third-party transactions; that object was not defeated by the form of payment. As the department did not rebut the society certificates and the assessees had substantially complied with the notification requirements, denial of exemption was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:01:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 237 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89328</link>
      <description>The exemption notification condition requiring payment by cheque drawn on a co-operative society&#039;s bank account was held to be directory, not mandatory, where the purchases were in fact made by registered co-operative societies and payments by demand draft or pay order came from their own bank accounts or funds. The condition was aimed at ensuring genuine society purchases and preventing third-party transactions; that object was not defeated by the form of payment. As the department did not rebut the society certificates and the assessees had substantially complied with the notification requirements, denial of exemption was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>