<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that a question of law arose on whether private challans, rather than prescribed documents, could validly support Modvat credit. Relying on the precedent in Hero Cycles Limited and principles of judicial discipline, it declined to decide the substantive legality itself and instead directed reference of the facts and legal question to the Punjab and Haryana High Court for determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that a question of law arose on whether private challans, rather than prescribed documents, could validly support Modvat credit. Relying on the precedent in Hero Cycles Limited and principles of judicial discipline, it declined to decide the substantive legality itself and instead directed reference of the facts and legal question to the Punjab and Haryana High Court for determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>