<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89298</link>
    <description>An exemption claim requiring factual verification cannot be raised for the first time in appeal unless it was shown to have been advanced before the adjudicating authority. The appellants failed to establish that the small-scale exemption notifications and Notification No. 115/75 had been claimed below, so the appellate forum declined to entertain them. With no other merit found in the challenge, the duty demand on mother rolls was confirmed and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89298</link>
      <description>An exemption claim requiring factual verification cannot be raised for the first time in appeal unless it was shown to have been advanced before the adjudicating authority. The appellants failed to establish that the small-scale exemption notifications and Notification No. 115/75 had been claimed below, so the appellate forum declined to entertain them. With no other merit found in the challenge, the duty demand on mother rolls was confirmed and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>