<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 223 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89283</link>
    <description>In an excise duty and penalty appeal, the tribunal considered whether waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and stay of recovery could be granted on a prima facie assessment of the case together with the appellant&#039;s financial hardship. It directed the appellant to make a partial deposit within three months and, on compliance, the balance of the duty demand and penalty was waived and recovery stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 223 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89283</link>
      <description>In an excise duty and penalty appeal, the tribunal considered whether waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and stay of recovery could be granted on a prima facie assessment of the case together with the appellant&#039;s financial hardship. It directed the appellant to make a partial deposit within three months and, on compliance, the balance of the duty demand and penalty was waived and recovery stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>