https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89256 Parts of nozzle and nozzle holder used in internal combustion engines were held eligible for Exemption Notification No. 217/85. The Tribunal treated the dispute as covered by its earlier decision in the appellants' own case on the same classification and duty issue, and followed that view because the earlier decision, though challenged before the Supreme Court, had not been stayed. On that basis, the notification was applied to the goods in dispute, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:18:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89256 Parts of nozzle and nozzle holder used in internal combustion engines were held eligible for Exemption Notification No. 217/85. The Tribunal treated the dispute as covered by its earlier decision in the appellants' own case on the same classification and duty issue, and followed that view because the earlier decision, though challenged before the Supreme Court, had not been stayed. On that basis, the notification was applied to the goods in dispute, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89256