<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 399 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89240</link>
    <description>Where the selling price of finished goods was available and not disputed, assessable value had to be determined under the primary price-based valuation provision rather than the residual cost-of-production rules. The availability of an undisputed price made resort to the alternative valuation mechanism unnecessary, and the Revenue&#039;s reliance on decisions involving captive consumption or disputed inclusions was distinguished. The lower appellate order was upheld, and the demand and penalty confirmed by the original authority did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 399 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89240</link>
      <description>Where the selling price of finished goods was available and not disputed, assessable value had to be determined under the primary price-based valuation provision rather than the residual cost-of-production rules. The availability of an undisputed price made resort to the alternative valuation mechanism unnecessary, and the Revenue&#039;s reliance on decisions involving captive consumption or disputed inclusions was distinguished. The lower appellate order was upheld, and the demand and penalty confirmed by the original authority did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>