<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 317 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89238</link>
    <description>A customs exemption notification was construed strictly and literally, so its benefit remained confined to apparatus or regulators designed for use in circuits of 400 V or above. Goods designed to function from 200 V to 1000 V did not satisfy that expressed condition, and the wording could not be enlarged beyond its clear terms. The claimed exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 317 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89238</link>
      <description>A customs exemption notification was construed strictly and literally, so its benefit remained confined to apparatus or regulators designed for use in circuits of 400 V or above. Goods designed to function from 200 V to 1000 V did not satisfy that expressed condition, and the wording could not be enlarged beyond its clear terms. The claimed exemption was therefore unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>