<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 316 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s prayer for a stay of the lower appellate authority&#039;s order that reduced the redemption value of goods, as the goods had already been released. The Tribunal emphasized that the Department must follow appellate authority orders or seek directions from the Tribunal when filing an appeal. It was clarified that the lower appellate authority&#039;s order would not set a precedent for releasing other goods pending Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of market sampling to determine the market value for fixing redemption fines and stressed the importance of conducting market inquiries before setting redemption fines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 316 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s prayer for a stay of the lower appellate authority&#039;s order that reduced the redemption value of goods, as the goods had already been released. The Tribunal emphasized that the Department must follow appellate authority orders or seek directions from the Tribunal when filing an appeal. It was clarified that the lower appellate authority&#039;s order would not set a precedent for releasing other goods pending Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of market sampling to determine the market value for fixing redemption fines and stressed the importance of conducting market inquiries before setting redemption fines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>