https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89217 Limitation for filing the appeal was computed by excluding the day on which the copy of the original order was received. On that basis, an appeal filed on 21-4-1986 was held to be within the period allowed by law, so the first appellate authority was wrong to treat it as time-barred by one day. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for disposal on merits after notice to the appellant. en-us Fri, 30 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:41:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89217 Limitation for filing the appeal was computed by excluding the day on which the copy of the original order was received. On that basis, an appeal filed on 21-4-1986 was held to be within the period allowed by law, so the first appellate authority was wrong to treat it as time-barred by one day. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for disposal on merits after notice to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89217