https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89206 The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking restoration of an appeal to its original number after a Final Order was passed despite the appellant's absence during the hearing. The appellant argued non-appearance was due to the former Advocate's fault. However, the Tribunal found the appellant's awareness of the hearing date, as indicated in a letter from the Advocate, undermined their claim. Ruling based on the case's merits rather than default, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal, citing insufficient cause for the appellant's absence and rejecting reliance on precedent cases. en-us Mon, 28 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:00:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89206 The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking restoration of an appeal to its original number after a Final Order was passed despite the appellant's absence during the hearing. The appellant argued non-appearance was due to the former Advocate's fault. However, the Tribunal found the appellant's awareness of the hearing date, as indicated in a letter from the Advocate, undermined their claim. Ruling based on the case's merits rather than default, the Tribunal upheld the dismissal, citing insufficient cause for the appellant's absence and rejecting reliance on precedent cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89206