<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 188 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89170</link>
    <description>A communication gap regarding the hearing date was accepted as sufficient cause for restoring the appeals and stay petition to their original number. The Tribunal noted that the earlier hearing date had fallen on a declared holiday and that the subsequent date was not effectively conveyed. On that factual basis, it restored the matters and directed the stay petition to be listed for hearing on the specified later date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:02:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 188 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89170</link>
      <description>A communication gap regarding the hearing date was accepted as sufficient cause for restoring the appeals and stay petition to their original number. The Tribunal noted that the earlier hearing date had fallen on a declared holiday and that the subsequent date was not effectively conveyed. On that factual basis, it restored the matters and directed the stay petition to be listed for hearing on the specified later date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>