https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89144 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further assessment. It found that the department's changed post-adjudication view, stating no duty was payable for the dilution process, required reconsideration by the original authority. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear findings on the applicability of Chapter Note 6 and careful consideration of the appellant's cited case laws regarding the non-constitutive nature of mere change in physical form. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:49:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89144 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further assessment. It found that the department's changed post-adjudication view, stating no duty was payable for the dilution process, required reconsideration by the original authority. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear findings on the applicability of Chapter Note 6 and careful consideration of the appellant's cited case laws regarding the non-constitutive nature of mere change in physical form. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89144