<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89112</link>
    <description>The amended proviso to Rule 57G(2) barred Modvat credit where duty-paying documents were more than six months old when credit was taken. Credit claimed in February 1996 on documents issued earlier than the six-month limit was therefore inadmissible, and the plea against retrospective operation did not alter that result. The legal effect is that the six-month restriction under the amended rule operates as a time bar on availment of Modvat credit based on stale documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 185 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89112</link>
      <description>The amended proviso to Rule 57G(2) barred Modvat credit where duty-paying documents were more than six months old when credit was taken. Credit claimed in February 1996 on documents issued earlier than the six-month limit was therefore inadmissible, and the plea against retrospective operation did not alter that result. The legal effect is that the six-month restriction under the amended rule operates as a time bar on availment of Modvat credit based on stale documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>