https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89106 An appellate order directing verification was not treated as vague or incapable of enforcement where it required factual examination of whether the goods received were formulated, standardised or prepared dyes and whether the processes adopted fell within the CBEC clarification dated 21-4-1993. The remand was viewed as a permissible course because the order identified the matters to be verified with sufficient clarity. The Revenue's objection to the validity of the order was rejected, and the remand-related verification direction was sustained. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:49:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89106 An appellate order directing verification was not treated as vague or incapable of enforcement where it required factual examination of whether the goods received were formulated, standardised or prepared dyes and whether the processes adopted fell within the CBEC clarification dated 21-4-1993. The remand was viewed as a permissible course because the order identified the matters to be verified with sufficient clarity. The Revenue's objection to the validity of the order was rejected, and the remand-related verification direction was sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89106