<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89101</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi dismissed the appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, affirming the order-in-appeal that dropped the demand related to the inclusion of spare parts&#039; value in the assessable value of goods cleared by the respondent, a manufacturer of Food Processors. The Tribunal held that duty had already been paid on the correct assessable value of the food processors initially cleared, and the value of replacement spare parts supplied later should not be added to the value of the complete products. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case involving dutiable spare parts manufactured and cleared by the appellant, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 174 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89101</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi dismissed the appeal by the Collector of Central Excise, affirming the order-in-appeal that dropped the demand related to the inclusion of spare parts&#039; value in the assessable value of goods cleared by the respondent, a manufacturer of Food Processors. The Tribunal held that duty had already been paid on the correct assessable value of the food processors initially cleared, and the value of replacement spare parts supplied later should not be added to the value of the complete products. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case involving dutiable spare parts manufactured and cleared by the appellant, ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>