https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89097 A reference application under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was held not maintainable because it did not frame any specific question of law. Mere dissatisfaction with the Tribunal's earlier order was insufficient, and a vague request that failed to identify a referable legal issue could not be entertained. On that basis, the application was rejected for want of merit and for not disclosing any proper ground for reference to the High Court. en-us Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:21:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89097 A reference application under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was held not maintainable because it did not frame any specific question of law. Mere dissatisfaction with the Tribunal's earlier order was insufficient, and a vague request that failed to identify a referable legal issue could not be entertained. On that basis, the application was rejected for want of merit and for not disclosing any proper ground for reference to the High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89097