<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal treated the application as fit for reference because the issue was identical to one earlier considered and the Supreme Court had already directed a reference on the same question. On that basis, the question of law was not decided on merits and was instead referred to the High Court for opinion. The Modvat eligibility issue therefore remained open for determination by the High Court rather than being finally resolved at the Tribunal stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal treated the application as fit for reference because the issue was identical to one earlier considered and the Supreme Court had already directed a reference on the same question. On that basis, the question of law was not decided on merits and was instead referred to the High Court for opinion. The Modvat eligibility issue therefore remained open for determination by the High Court rather than being finally resolved at the Tribunal stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>