<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 130 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89058</link>
    <description>Equalised freight was deductible from assessable value where goods were sold at a uniform all-India price and transportation cost was genuinely incurred across sales; the existence of some factory-gate sales did not by itself defeat the deduction. Average discount was also deductible where it was computed from actual discounts allowed to different buyers at varying rates, because non-uniform discount rates did not make the deduction invalid when the method reflected the real commercial incidence passed on to customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 130 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89058</link>
      <description>Equalised freight was deductible from assessable value where goods were sold at a uniform all-India price and transportation cost was genuinely incurred across sales; the existence of some factory-gate sales did not by itself defeat the deduction. Average discount was also deductible where it was computed from actual discounts allowed to different buyers at varying rates, because non-uniform discount rates did not make the deduction invalid when the method reflected the real commercial incidence passed on to customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>