<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89057</link>
    <description>Hearing notices sent to the factory address were not received after the appellants changed addresses, and the record showed deposit of the duty amount under the earlier stay order. In the absence of any surviving substantive objection from the respondent, the applications for restoration were found fit for acceptance. The 14 dismissed appeals were restored to their original number.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89057</link>
      <description>Hearing notices sent to the factory address were not received after the appellants changed addresses, and the record showed deposit of the duty amount under the earlier stay order. In the absence of any surviving substantive objection from the respondent, the applications for restoration were found fit for acceptance. The 14 dismissed appeals were restored to their original number.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>