<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 120 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89048</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 90/88-C.E. was withdrawn by Notification No. 202/88-C.E. and later restored by Notification No. 170/89-C.E. The later notification was treated as clarificatory and capable of retrospective operation, so the exemption position was taken to apply for the relevant period. On that basis, the balance of convenience favoured the assessee, leading to waiver of the total duty demand and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 120 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89048</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 90/88-C.E. was withdrawn by Notification No. 202/88-C.E. and later restored by Notification No. 170/89-C.E. The later notification was treated as clarificatory and capable of retrospective operation, so the exemption position was taken to apply for the relevant period. On that basis, the balance of convenience favoured the assessee, leading to waiver of the total duty demand and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>