<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 113 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89041</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible where endorsed Bills of Entry and transporter-copy invoices sufficiently identified the goods, and where defects in records were only clerical or unsupported by the evidence. Installation certificate submission was accepted as already made, and the authority could not rely on a new ground outside the show-cause notice. By contrast, credit was not allowed where it rested on a Xerox copy of an invoice or on a liquor ammonia entry made before the invoice date, as those defects went to the validity of the supporting document and entry itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:35:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 113 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89041</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible where endorsed Bills of Entry and transporter-copy invoices sufficiently identified the goods, and where defects in records were only clerical or unsupported by the evidence. Installation certificate submission was accepted as already made, and the authority could not rely on a new ground outside the show-cause notice. By contrast, credit was not allowed where it rested on a Xerox copy of an invoice or on a liquor ammonia entry made before the invoice date, as those defects went to the validity of the supporting document and entry itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>