<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 108 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89036</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the duty demand was stayed pending appeal because conflicting Supreme Court views existed on the period for which the duty demand could be raised. The matter concerned interim relief on the duty liability, with the conflicting legal position supporting suspension of recovery until the appeal was decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 108 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89036</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the duty demand was stayed pending appeal because conflicting Supreme Court views existed on the period for which the duty demand could be raised. The matter concerned interim relief on the duty liability, with the conflicting legal position supporting suspension of recovery until the appeal was decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>