<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 290 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89031</link>
    <description>Where Modvat credit and exemption under Notification No. 202/88 are claimed simultaneously, separate records for duty-paid inputs and open-market inputs are mandatory to enable segregation and departmental verification. The absence of such records is not treated as a mere technical lapse, and a later attempt to reconstruct entries from daily journals is insufficient. Non-compliance with the prescribed record-keeping procedure therefore disentitles the claimant to the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 290 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89031</link>
      <description>Where Modvat credit and exemption under Notification No. 202/88 are claimed simultaneously, separate records for duty-paid inputs and open-market inputs are mandatory to enable segregation and departmental verification. The absence of such records is not treated as a mere technical lapse, and a later attempt to reconstruct entries from daily journals is insufficient. Non-compliance with the prescribed record-keeping procedure therefore disentitles the claimant to the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>