<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89016</link>
    <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly, but not in a way that leads to an absurd result. Where goods were cleared within the prescribed limits for duty-free clearance, the assessee could not be denied the notification benefit merely because Modvat credit was not availed. The record did not support a demand for differential duty on the basis that the assessee had chosen a particular route under the notification, and calculation of duty at the tariff rate was unwarranted on those facts. The demand for differential duty was therefore not sustainable, and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89016</link>
      <description>An exemption notification must be construed strictly, but not in a way that leads to an absurd result. Where goods were cleared within the prescribed limits for duty-free clearance, the assessee could not be denied the notification benefit merely because Modvat credit was not availed. The record did not support a demand for differential duty on the basis that the assessee had chosen a particular route under the notification, and calculation of duty at the tariff rate was unwarranted on those facts. The demand for differential duty was therefore not sustainable, and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>