<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89011</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the disallowance of deductions on zonal price lists by lower authorities. The dispute also encompassed the demand of Central Excise duty based on approval orders, as well as the deduction of turnover tax and octroi. The Tribunal determined that deductions could be allowed on an equalized basis to maintain price uniformity within a zone, citing legal precedents such as the Bombay Tyre International case. Ultimately, the Tribunal found the demand based on equalized turnover tax and octroi to be unsustainable, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 270 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89011</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the disallowance of deductions on zonal price lists by lower authorities. The dispute also encompassed the demand of Central Excise duty based on approval orders, as well as the deduction of turnover tax and octroi. The Tribunal determined that deductions could be allowed on an equalized basis to maintain price uniformity within a zone, citing legal precedents such as the Bombay Tyre International case. Ultimately, the Tribunal found the demand based on equalized turnover tax and octroi to be unsustainable, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>