<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89007</link>
    <description>Three obvious typographical errors in the Tribunal&#039;s final order were corrected by substituting specified sentences on pages 2, 3 and 4. The rectification was confined to clerical mistakes and the order was amended only to that extent, with no change to the substantive conclusions or the remainder of the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 381 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89007</link>
      <description>Three obvious typographical errors in the Tribunal&#039;s final order were corrected by substituting specified sentences on pages 2, 3 and 4. The rectification was confined to clerical mistakes and the order was amended only to that extent, with no change to the substantive conclusions or the remainder of the tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>