<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89000</link>
    <description>An exemption notification excluding transformers and chokes for fluorescent tubes did not extend, on its plain wording, to parts of transformers. Radiators found to be transformer parts therefore remained within the notification benefit, and the departmental appeal failed. The principle applied was that an exclusion in an exemption notification must be read narrowly and cannot be extended to component parts without clear words.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:26:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89000</link>
      <description>An exemption notification excluding transformers and chokes for fluorescent tubes did not extend, on its plain wording, to parts of transformers. Radiators found to be transformer parts therefore remained within the notification benefit, and the departmental appeal failed. The principle applied was that an exclusion in an exemption notification must be read narrowly and cannot be extended to component parts without clear words.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>