<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 288 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to reject the declared invoice price and found that the appellant had mis-declared the quantity. The Tribunal adjusted the assessable value based on comparable prices and reduced the penalty, partially allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate declarations and the applicability of contemporaneous import prices in determining assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:59:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 288 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s decision to reject the declared invoice price and found that the appellant had mis-declared the quantity. The Tribunal adjusted the assessable value based on comparable prices and reduced the penalty, partially allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate declarations and the applicability of contemporaneous import prices in determining assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>