<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 304 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88969</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled that converting duty-paid &quot;Araldite&quot; resin into a solution by dissolving it in solvents does not attract additional duty under tariff entry 15A(1). The tribunal held that this conversion does not constitute manufacture under the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. It emphasized that charging duty on the resin in a different form would result in double taxation, highlighting that a mere change in form without altering chemical properties typically does not amount to manufacture unless it creates a product with distinct characteristics. The tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by legal precedents and a comprehensive analysis of the relevant tariff entry and explanations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:44:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 304 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88969</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled that converting duty-paid &quot;Araldite&quot; resin into a solution by dissolving it in solvents does not attract additional duty under tariff entry 15A(1). The tribunal held that this conversion does not constitute manufacture under the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act, 1944. It emphasized that charging duty on the resin in a different form would result in double taxation, highlighting that a mere change in form without altering chemical properties typically does not amount to manufacture unless it creates a product with distinct characteristics. The tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by legal precedents and a comprehensive analysis of the relevant tariff entry and explanations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>