<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 275 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88955</link>
    <description>Objective lenses for cameras were treated as parts of the camera, not as accessories, because they replaced the normal lens and functioned as an integral component for taking photographs from a distance. The classification entry specifically covered objective lenses for cameras, and the policy materials supported free import under Open General Licence. On that basis, the item did not fall within the restrictive accessory category, and clearance under OGL was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:53:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 275 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88955</link>
      <description>Objective lenses for cameras were treated as parts of the camera, not as accessories, because they replaced the normal lens and functioned as an integral component for taking photographs from a distance. The classification entry specifically covered objective lenses for cameras, and the policy materials supported free import under Open General Licence. On that basis, the item did not fall within the restrictive accessory category, and clearance under OGL was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>