<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88928</link>
    <description>Steel sheets used to fabricate molasses tanks were held not to qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q because they were merely inputs for making the tanks and not parts, spares, accessories, plant, machinery or equipment themselves. The Tribunal distinguished the cited authorities and applied the principle that goods used to manufacture an item do not become capital goods simply because the finished item is later used in production. Modvat credit was therefore denied, and the assessee&#039;s appeal failed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:28:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88928</link>
      <description>Steel sheets used to fabricate molasses tanks were held not to qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q because they were merely inputs for making the tanks and not parts, spares, accessories, plant, machinery or equipment themselves. The Tribunal distinguished the cited authorities and applied the principle that goods used to manufacture an item do not become capital goods simply because the finished item is later used in production. Modvat credit was therefore denied, and the assessee&#039;s appeal failed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>