https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88887 The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing distribution expenses as non-admissible abatement, citing the MRF case precedent. Regarding the sales tax deduction, the Tribunal remanded the matter for further review, requiring the appellant to provide evidence of incurring the sales tax liability without receiving a refund. The decision stressed the significance of substantiating claims with clear documentation for fair assessment. en-us Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:36:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88887 The Tribunal set aside the order disallowing distribution expenses as non-admissible abatement, citing the MRF case precedent. Regarding the sales tax deduction, the Tribunal remanded the matter for further review, requiring the appellant to provide evidence of incurring the sales tax liability without receiving a refund. The decision stressed the significance of substantiating claims with clear documentation for fair assessment. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88887