<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88873</link>
    <description>A composite imported instrument described as a network analyser with spectrum analyser did not qualify for concessional customs duty under the cited exemption notifications because exemption entries must be construed strictly and the goods had to answer the specific notified description in the form imported. The fact that the composite product had a similar concessional rate under another notification did not expand coverage under the notifications relied on in appeal. The appellate view was rejected, and the original duty liability was upheld in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88873</link>
      <description>A composite imported instrument described as a network analyser with spectrum analyser did not qualify for concessional customs duty under the cited exemption notifications because exemption entries must be construed strictly and the goods had to answer the specific notified description in the form imported. The fact that the composite product had a similar concessional rate under another notification did not expand coverage under the notifications relied on in appeal. The appellate view was rejected, and the original duty liability was upheld in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>