<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88842</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the provisional assessment persisted post-debonding due to factors like bond status and ongoing verification, overturning prior decisions. The case was remanded for reevaluation of provisional assessments, bond cancellations, and classification matters, favoring the appellant for further review by the initial authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:53:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 265 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88842</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the provisional assessment persisted post-debonding due to factors like bond status and ongoing verification, overturning prior decisions. The case was remanded for reevaluation of provisional assessments, bond cancellations, and classification matters, favoring the appellant for further review by the initial authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>