https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88835 The Tribunal refused adjournment where the appellant sought time on the ground that its file was misplaced and could not be traced, noting that counsel had already appeared on an earlier date. As no one appeared for the appellant when the matter was called, the appeal was dismissed for default in appearance under Rule 20 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:37:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88835 The Tribunal refused adjournment where the appellant sought time on the ground that its file was misplaced and could not be traced, noting that counsel had already appeared on an earlier date. As no one appeared for the appellant when the matter was called, the appeal was dismissed for default in appearance under Rule 20 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88835