https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88808 The appeal was allowed in a case involving demand confirmation under Section 28(2) for incorrect credit given against export of Glacial Acetic Acid. The appellants successfully argued for duty credit based on ethyl alcohol rates due to denaturation requirements imposed by the State Government. The judgment emphasized compliance with norms, the relevance of DGFT clarification, and rejected the Lower Authority's argument limiting credit amount based on the exported product cost. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:00:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88808 The appeal was allowed in a case involving demand confirmation under Section 28(2) for incorrect credit given against export of Glacial Acetic Acid. The appellants successfully argued for duty credit based on ethyl alcohol rates due to denaturation requirements imposed by the State Government. The judgment emphasized compliance with norms, the relevance of DGFT clarification, and rejected the Lower Authority's argument limiting credit amount based on the exported product cost. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88808