<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 275 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88768</link>
    <description>Rice bran oil was held not to fall within the statutory expression &quot;vegetable oil&quot; because the Cess Act did not define that term and the Court read it in light of Section 3(h) of the Development Board Act and the legislation&#039;s object of supporting the oilseeds and vegetable oils industry. The Court treated rice bran as a milling by-product, noted that rice bran oil is obtained by solvent extraction, and relied on the fact that it is not fit for human consumption; on that basis, rice bran oil was excluded from the ambit of &quot;vegetable oil&quot; under the relevant definition, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 275 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88768</link>
      <description>Rice bran oil was held not to fall within the statutory expression &quot;vegetable oil&quot; because the Cess Act did not define that term and the Court read it in light of Section 3(h) of the Development Board Act and the legislation&#039;s object of supporting the oilseeds and vegetable oils industry. The Court treated rice bran as a milling by-product, noted that rice bran oil is obtained by solvent extraction, and relied on the fact that it is not fit for human consumption; on that basis, rice bran oil was excluded from the ambit of &quot;vegetable oil&quot; under the relevant definition, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>