<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88758</link>
    <description>Closely connected units under common ownership, management, premises and trading channels may have their clearances clubbed as those of one manufacturer for exemption purposes, even without formal profit-sharing or documented financial flow-back. Where sales are routed through connected concerns with no genuine independent movement or dealing, the assessable value may be taken as the last sale price to independent wholesalers. A diary-based demand for alleged clandestine manufacture and clearance cannot stand without proper reconciliation of diary entries with excise records, export figures and removals; that component was set aside and remanded for fresh quantification. Deliberate suppression and staged transactions also justified invocation of the extended limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 265 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88758</link>
      <description>Closely connected units under common ownership, management, premises and trading channels may have their clearances clubbed as those of one manufacturer for exemption purposes, even without formal profit-sharing or documented financial flow-back. Where sales are routed through connected concerns with no genuine independent movement or dealing, the assessable value may be taken as the last sale price to independent wholesalers. A diary-based demand for alleged clandestine manufacture and clearance cannot stand without proper reconciliation of diary entries with excise records, export figures and removals; that component was set aside and remanded for fresh quantification. Deliberate suppression and staged transactions also justified invocation of the extended limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>