<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of cast copper rods as unwrought under sub-heading 7410.00 based on the manufacturing process outlined by the Assistant Collector. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging this classification was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the classification should be determined by the actual manufacturing process. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s cross-objections since the lower appellate authority had already accepted the classification argued by the respondents. This case underscores the importance of considering the manufacturing process in classifying goods for customs purposes and ensuring alignment with the goods&#039; characteristics and processing stages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:52:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 266 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of cast copper rods as unwrought under sub-heading 7410.00 based on the manufacturing process outlined by the Assistant Collector. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging this classification was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the classification should be determined by the actual manufacturing process. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s cross-objections since the lower appellate authority had already accepted the classification argued by the respondents. This case underscores the importance of considering the manufacturing process in classifying goods for customs purposes and ensuring alignment with the goods&#039; characteristics and processing stages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>