<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88716</link>
    <description>Glass fibre and asbestos based compregs, mouldings and components, and articles in which glass reinforcement yarn predominated by weight were treated as goods of the same nature as earlier Supreme Court cases on similar laminated glass fibre articles. Applying that settled classification principle, the Tribunal followed the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier rulings and classified the items under Tariff Item 68 rather than Tariff Item 22F(4), with the result that the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:23:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88716</link>
      <description>Glass fibre and asbestos based compregs, mouldings and components, and articles in which glass reinforcement yarn predominated by weight were treated as goods of the same nature as earlier Supreme Court cases on similar laminated glass fibre articles. Applying that settled classification principle, the Tribunal followed the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier rulings and classified the items under Tariff Item 68 rather than Tariff Item 22F(4), with the result that the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>