<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88713</link>
    <description>In excise valuation, clandestinely cleared goods were accepted as man-made fabrics where the assessee failed to produce reliable internal records linking the disputed lots to cotton fabrics. A claimed uniform 1% discount was rejected because it was not shown in the price list or otherwise established as a disclosed term available to buyers. The duty element remained deductible from assessable value under the valuation scheme, regardless of whether duty had been collected from buyers, so the value had to be recomputed after excluding duty. The penalty was reduced because duty had been paid before adjudication and partly before notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:18:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 242 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88713</link>
      <description>In excise valuation, clandestinely cleared goods were accepted as man-made fabrics where the assessee failed to produce reliable internal records linking the disputed lots to cotton fabrics. A claimed uniform 1% discount was rejected because it was not shown in the price list or otherwise established as a disclosed term available to buyers. The duty element remained deductible from assessable value under the valuation scheme, regardless of whether duty had been collected from buyers, so the value had to be recomputed after excluding duty. The penalty was reduced because duty had been paid before adjudication and partly before notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>