<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 314 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88706</link>
    <description>An exemption for ammonia under Notification No. 40/85 applied only where the ammonia was used in the manufacture of fertilizers. Although molten urea remained tariff-classified as fertilizer after the Chapter 31 note amendment, that classification did not satisfy the notification&#039;s requirement of actual use, because the molten urea was used as an intermediate for melamine, which is not a fertilizer. The main exemption was therefore unavailable. The alternative claim under Notification No. 217/86 had not been examined by the lower authorities, so that claim was remanded for fresh consideration in light of the earlier order and the governing law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:46:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 314 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88706</link>
      <description>An exemption for ammonia under Notification No. 40/85 applied only where the ammonia was used in the manufacture of fertilizers. Although molten urea remained tariff-classified as fertilizer after the Chapter 31 note amendment, that classification did not satisfy the notification&#039;s requirement of actual use, because the molten urea was used as an intermediate for melamine, which is not a fertilizer. The main exemption was therefore unavailable. The alternative claim under Notification No. 217/86 had not been examined by the lower authorities, so that claim was remanded for fresh consideration in light of the earlier order and the governing law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>