<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 319 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88698</link>
    <description>Deduction from the price list for hundi discounting charges was examined in determining assessable value. The charges were treated as the cost of discounting hundies executed by customers for payment after a fixed period, functioning in substance as interest attributable to delayed payment. Relying on the precedent cited, the deduction was held to be allowable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 319 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88698</link>
      <description>Deduction from the price list for hundi discounting charges was examined in determining assessable value. The charges were treated as the cost of discounting hundies executed by customers for payment after a fixed period, functioning in substance as interest attributable to delayed payment. Relying on the precedent cited, the deduction was held to be allowable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>