<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 234 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88694</link>
    <description>Customs duty paid on re-import of goods exported earlier under bond is not refundable merely because the goods are later exported again. The Tribunal held that duty levied on re-import under section 20 of the Customs Act is customs duty, not excise duty, and the Act contains no general provision for refund on a subsequent export. Any relief after re-export must be claimed under the statutory drawback mechanism under section 74. As the importer did not seek drawback, the refund claim was not maintainable and was rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:19:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=125759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 234 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88694</link>
      <description>Customs duty paid on re-import of goods exported earlier under bond is not refundable merely because the goods are later exported again. The Tribunal held that duty levied on re-import under section 20 of the Customs Act is customs duty, not excise duty, and the Act contains no general provision for refund on a subsequent export. Any relief after re-export must be claimed under the statutory drawback mechanism under section 74. As the importer did not seek drawback, the refund claim was not maintainable and was rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=88694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>